Authors are expected to present original research that has not been published elsewhere. All data, methods and findings must be reported accurately, without fabrication, falsification or inappropriate manipulation.
Contributions of others must be properly acknowledged and cited. Plagiarism in any form is unacceptable and will result in rejection.
Any potential conflicts of interest affecting the results or interpretation of the work must be disclosed. Submitting the same manuscript to multiple venues simultaneously is strictly prohibited.
To maintain the integrity of the proceedings, all submitted manuscripts are screened for plagiarism. Manuscripts with a similarity index exceeding the permitted threshold will be scrutinised, and authors may be asked to revise or explain overlaps.
Confirmed plagiarism leads to rejection and may result in further action.
| Formatting at a Glance | |
|---|---|
| Paper Type | Full Paper |
| Abstract | 300–500 Words |
| Authors | Up to 5 |
| Keywords | 5–6 |
| Length | Maximum 5 Pages |
| Paper Size | A4 |
| Font | Times New Roman, 10 pt |
| Line Spacing | 1.0 |
| Template | Taylor & Francis |
| File Format | |
| Review Process | Double-Blind |
| Submission Portal | Microsoft CMT |
Submit your paper through the official Microsoft CMT submission portal.
Go to CMT Portal →CMT ACKNOWLEDGMENT: The Microsoft CMT service was used for managing the peer-reviewing process for this conference. This service was provided for free by Microsoft and they bore all expenses, including costs for Azure cloud services as well as for software development and support.
A transparent review process generally follows these stages:
Program chairs or the organizing committee review all submissions for adherence to formatting rules, scope, and word limits.
If operating a double-blind peer review, author names and affiliations are scrubbed to prevent bias.
Submissions are distributed to independent domain experts or a scientific program committee based on their expertise.
Three reviewers will evaluate each paper.
The committee synthesizes the feedback. Organizers may allow an author rebuttal period before making a final accept, reject, or revise decision.
Submissions should not be under consideration elsewhere and all sources should be appropriately cited. Similarity with other papers should be low — it is the responsibility of the authors to ensure the similarity index of the paper stays within the permitted threshold. If the plagiarism level exceeds the limit, the conference organizers have the right to exclude the paper from publication.
To ensure consistency, reviewers are provided with clear evaluation criteria, an assessment scale, and formatting instructions. Reviewers should evaluate submissions based on:
The submission should align with the conference's themes and objectives.
The findings, methodologies, or applications are new and distinct from past work.
The research design, data collection, and analysis should be scientifically sound and valid.
The paper should be well-organized, logically structured, and written in clear, understandable language.
For authors and reviewers — these statements ensure academic integrity in submissions and peer review.
All submitted work must be original, unpublished, and not under consideration elsewhere. Plagiarism, including self-plagiarism or text-recycling, is strictly prohibited.
Authors must present data and methodologies honestly. Fabrication, falsification, or selective reporting of data are serious ethical breaches. For studies involving human or animal subjects, proof of ethical approval (e.g., IRB) and informed consent must be available upon request.
All authors must disclose any financial, institutional, or personal relationships that could influence their research. Reviewers must recuse themselves if they have a conflict of interest and must treat all submitted manuscripts as confidential.
Authorship should be limited to those who have made a significant contribution to the conception, design, or interpretation of the reported study.
These statements govern professional behavior during the conference.
The conference is dedicated to providing a harassment-free experience for everyone, regardless of gender, sexual orientation, disability, physical appearance, body size, race, or religion. Harassment in any form — including offensive comments, unwelcome attention, or stalking — will not be tolerated.
All communication, whether in oral presentations, Q&A sessions, or online forums, should be professional and constructive. Personal attacks or inappropriate criticism are unacceptable.
Unauthorized recording, screenshotting, or sharing of unpublished presentations or proprietary data is prohibited without the express consent of the presenter.
|
Registrar Phone Number: +91 7840099618 Email id: registrar.office@niu.edu.in |